Garbage collections improvements in CLR 4.0

Recently I was running the example provided by Andrew Hunter on his blog "The Dangers of the Large Object Heap" compiled against .NET 4 and I got the following numbers:

With large blocks: 622Mb allocated

With large blocks, frequent garbage collections: 582Mb allocated

Only small block开发者_StackOverflows: 1803Mb allocated

With large blocks, large blocks not growing: 630Mb allocated

If the same code is compiled against.NET 2.0 I got almost the numbers mentioned in article:

With large blocks: 21Mb allocated

With large blocks, frequent garbage collections: 26Mb allocated

Only small blocks: 1811Mb allocated

With large blocks, large blocks not growing: 707Mb allocated

What is the cause of such dramatical improvement?

Code is compiled for x86 platform and is run on Windows 7

Some much needed work from the CLR team is the reason for the improvements, but apparently there is room for improvement still:

http://mitch-wheat.blogspot.com/2010/11/net-clr-large-object-heap.html

Something changed but it is a well kept secret, I can find nothing about it. I wouldn't put too much stock into it. The code sample was hand-tuned to the make the CLR 2 large object heap look as bad as possible. Even a small change in the algorithm, perhaps inspired by the blog post, will have very large effects.

I can think of some easy things Microsoft could have done to the memory allocator that would have greatly reduced LOH fragmentation without major overhaul, such as rounding allocation sizes up to some multiple like 4K. Given that the smallest non-static LOH objects were 85K, that would represent at most a 5% loss of useful space, but would reduce the number of different-sized objects and gaps. BTW, I'm really unconvinced of the value forcing all big objects to the LOH (as opposed to, perhaps, having a means of designating when an object is created whether it should go to the LOH or not). I can understand some value in separating small objects from big ones once they reach Level 2, but there are enough cases where big objects get created and abandoned that forcing them to level 2 seems counterproductive.