Rails alternative to including active record call in view
I have a form partial that looks like this:
<%= form_for(@pool) do |f| %>
<div class="field">
<%= f.label :name %><br />
<%= f.text_field :name %>
</div>
<div class="field">
<%= f.label :tournament %><br />
<%= f.collection_select :tournament_id, Tournament.active, :id, :name, :prompt => true %>
</div>
<div class="actions">
<%= f.submit %>
</div>
<% end %>
This seems like a code smell because the view shouldn't be responsible for knowing how to get the data for the <select>
tag. The alternative to have the controller assign an instance variable is problematic because I have to replicate that code in several actions depending on whether or not this form is rendered.
In ASP.NET MVC I'd just pull that field out into a partial view and display it with a call to RenderAction
Which would evaluate a common controller action. However, in Ra开发者_运维知识库ils render :action => '/view'
seems to only allow full blown views to be rendered. I'm pretty new to Rails so I'm not sure about what the best practices are.
You can do a helper method as coder_tim suggests, but in my opinion that still leaves data access in the view.
The controller is the proper place for this and if you're worried about duplication, set up a before_filter that only acts on the actions that need this collection:
before_filter :get_active_tournaments, :only => [:new, :edit]
for example.
Hope this helps.
I like the smell of that code :) Simplicity over extremism. Less files = less methods to worry = cleaner code.
However, there are times when a dropdown is used too many times in your application, and it's a little more complicated than just calling a scope. In that cases, I write a helper.
精彩评论