torquebox for production. Anyone?
I want to migrate my infrastructure to jRuby. The most complete options as I see is torquebox. Anyone can share something about it? compared to to开发者_Go百科mcat/jetty?
I am using TorqueBox 1.0 Release Candidate for 24x7 mission critical production solutions. It has been adopted as the platform of choice for all new development on my project, replacing a very expensive commercial ESB. Although HornetQ is not (yet) replacing our business's enterprise JMS provider, we are using HornetQ heavily to a growing collection of loosely coupled JRuby components.
In my view, TorqueBox is a superb blend of a world class application server with high-availability features built-in, a high performance messaging server (HA-JMS, HA-JNDI), and my favorite programming language.
As a bonus, my productivity has soared since working almost exclusively in JRuby.
We are using Torquebox 2.x with Sunspot/Solr for a number of search based websites for the NHS (UK). These sites have very high page views and caching is difficult so mostly we serve dynamic content.
I would highly recommend JRuby/Torquebox
- Torquebox has excellent support via IRC and the Mailing list
- Torquebox is open source, but commerically backed by Redhat
- Torquebox makes infrastructure easy, no separate message queue, background processes out of the box etc. etc.
- JRuby is threadsafe and fast
- JRuby has access to all the Java libraries (we use jsoup, fly saucer for PDF generation)
We also use jboss AS7 (not Torquebox) with HornetQ and a mixed jruby java environment in critical projects for production. Assynchronous processes a treated in java in the background, the rest in jruby on rails (frontend stuff - user interaction) It will go live this year.
精彩评论