Java generics with typed container/containment relationships between two classes

I am hoping to produce some base classes that will include something like the following

class Container<T extends Containee>
{
     T containee;
     public T getContents(){return containee;}
     public void setContents(T contents){ containee = contents; containee.setContainer(this); }
}

class Containee<T extends Container>
{
     T container;
     public T getContainer(){return container;}
     public void setContainer(T container){this.container = container;}
}

There is a circular definition problem here which I thought I could ease using wildcards

class Container<T extends Containee<?>>
class Containee<T extends Container<?>>

except that the compiler complains about containee.setContainer(this). I have hacked a couple of ad-hoc solutions that will get the super-classes to compile, but nothing that will work for sub-classes, e.g.

class Foo extends Container<Bar>
class Bar extends Containee<Foo> 

The generics tutorial and FAQ didn't seem to have anything obvious relating to th开发者_如何学Cis. How does one express such a relationship using generics?

Thanks

Perhaps something like:

abstract class Container<
    THIS extends Container<THIS, T>,
    T extends Containee<T, THIS>
> {
    T containee;

    protected abstract THIS getThis();

    public T getContents() {
        return containee;
    }
    public void setContents(T contents){
        containee = contents;
        containee.setContainer(getThis());
    }
}

class Containee<
    THIS extends Containee<THIS, T>,
    T extends Container<T, THIS>
> {
    T container;
    public T getContainer() {
        return container;
    }
    public void setContainer(T container) {
        this.container = container;
    }
}

(Or perhaps something with less generics.)

Try this:

class Container<T extends Containee<Container<T>>>
{
   T containee;
   public T getContents(){return containee;}
   public void setContents(T contents){ containee = contents; containee.setContainer(this); }
}

class Containee<T extends Container<? extends Containee<T>>>
{
   T container;
   public T getContainer(){return container;}
   public void setContainer(T container){this.container = container;}
}

class Bar extends Containee<Container<Bar>> {  
}

class Foo extends Container<Bar> {
}

Foo now is a container accepting Bar objects whereas Bar would be addable to any container extending Container, so this would be possible as well:

class Baz extends Container<Bar> {
}

Baz is a container for Bar objects, too.

Would this be better with plain old polymorphism?

class Container
{
    Containee containee;
    public Containee getContents(){return containee;}
    public void setContents(Containee contents){ containee = contents; containee.setContainer(this); }
}

class Containee
{
    Container container;
    public Container getContainer(){return container;}
    public void setContainer(Container container){this.container = container;}
}

what is the problem with your first solution?

class Container<T extends Containee>
class Containee<T extends Container>