开发者

NAND RAW access

I'm working with a C++ application in an embedded systems running Linux. This device receives messages (small chunk of few bytes) an开发者_Go百科d need to be stored in a non volatile memory in case of power failure. This worked well with another platform because a static RAM was available.

The problem on this platform is that we only have a NAND Flash to do this and we would like to append different message in the same block without having to erase the whole block before updating it with a new message ! Writing a file per messages is not a good solution because there can be a lot of them ! Moreover, this must be efficient and should be life sparing for the flash by avoiding too much erases ! What I would like to be able to do is writing byte after byte into the flash without worrying about bad blocks.

I found "Petit FAT File System" and I'm wondering if this would suite my needs ... ?

Could someone tell me if this is possible with "Petit FAT File System" or give me any suggestion on how to handle this ?

Thanks !


I haven't looked into Petit file system, but your real limitation is the NAND flash. The manufacture data sheet will likely indicate how many writes you can successfully make to each block, before an erase is required. It's possible that there is no hard limit, but the integrity of the data will not be guaranteed after a max write count.

The answer depends on the process technology and flash cell design. For example, is it SLC or MLC NAND? SLC is going to be able to handle multiple block writes better.

Another question would be what type of flash controller is on your system? If it uses hardware ECC, then you might be limited by the controller, since 2nd writes will invalidate the ECC value of the 1st data write. If it is possible that you can do ECC calculations in software, then it comes back to the NAND limitation.

Small write support might be addressed in the data sheet, via a special set aside memory area that might be provided. So again, check the data sheet.

If you post a link, or indicate what hardware you are using, I can try and give you a more definite answer.


If you are dealing with flash, there's no way around deleting it before writing. All flash memory works in that way. Depending on your real-time requirements and the size of the data, this may or may not be an issue. But since you are using embedded Linux, real-time is probably not a major concern for the application anyhow.

I don't see why you would need a complete file system to store a few bytes?! Why do you need an external memory for this in the first place, can't you write to the internal flash of the MCU? If you just need to store a few bytes, an MCU with on-chip eeprom/data flash would likely suit your needs the best.

Also, that flash circuit doesn't look too promising. First I find it mighty fishy that they don't type out the number of cycles nor the data retention but refer to the "gualification report". This might indicate that the the memory is of poor quality. And the data sheet says year 2009 and Samsung. If I may be cynical, that probably means that the chip is already obsolete. Samsung doesn't exactly have the best long-life reputation.


I'm curious why you want to use raw flash. Why not use something like JFFS2 or UBIFS on top of the MTD drive? Let the MTD driver manage the ECC while JFFS2 or UBIFS manages the wear-leveling. Then just open one file and write to it whenever you need.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜